Three genera with 40 species. The genera include:
Some authors elevate the family to the level of an order, Araucariales Heintze (1927). Relationships within the family, long contested (see the Agathis and Araucaria descriptions), have recently been elucidated by genetic (rbcL) analyses performed on 29 species within the family (Setoguchi et al. 1998). Phylogenetic trees for these analyses agree that all three genera are monophyletic and that Wollemia is the most primitive of the three. Within Araucaria, the four sections previously recognized (Araucaria, Bunya, Eutacta, and Intermedia) are supported, but relationships within Agathis remain somewhat unclear (see Agathis for more information). "The New Caledonian Araucaria and Agathis species each formed a monophyletic group with very low differentiation in rbcL sequences among them, indicating rapid adaptive radiation to new edaphic conditions, i.e., ultramafic soils, in the post-Eocene era" (Setoguchi et al. 1998). A possible phylogenetic tree is here reproduced (Kershaw and Wagstaff 2001, modified from Setoguchi et al. 1998).
Evergreen trees with spirally arranged, narrow or broad leaves often with parallel veins. Dioecious or monoecious. Male cones relatively large, cylindrical, with numerous sporophylls and with ±12 inverted pollen sacs; pollen grains wingless. Female cone usually borne erect, subglobose to ovoid, maturing in two years, relatively large and milky, falling upon maturity; scales one-seeded, without distinct bracts. Cotyledons 4, often fused into 2 double cotyledons (Silba 1986).
Species in the Araucariaceae are endomycorrhizal (McKenzie et al. 2002).
Primarily the southern hemisphere. Araucarian species are almost all found in rainforest, the principal exceptions being the montane Araucaria araucana of South America and the Araucaria species found in sclerophyllous maquis vegetation on ultramafic substrates in New Caledonia (Kershaw and Wagstaff 2001). In most settings they are among the largest and tallest trees found in their respective forests, despite which they are usually unable to regenerate under a dense canopy in the absence of disturbance, and thus are early seral species.
"Members of the Araucariaceae are now restricted to the South American and Southwest Asia-Western Pacific region despite their extensive distribution in both hemispheres during the Mesozoic. A relictual status is also suggested by generally low species diversity and disjunct distributions on continental masses. However, relatively high diversity is recorded on islands in the Pacific and the Southeast Asian region, indicating conditions suitable for survival and continuous evolution through a long period of geological time or more recent dispersal and rapid evolution from continental sources" (Kershaw and Wagstaff 2001). This discussion leads on to an intriguing hypothesis: that most, if not all, of the extant Araucarian taxa have evolved since early Tertiary time, and that this evolution and adaptive radiation occurred therefore in the islands of Australasia, where nearly all of the extant diversity (excepting only the two South American species of Araucaria, and two Agathis species on the Malay peninsula) is found. This is a striking pattern because it means that this family of conifers has been most successful in precisely the environment where angiosperms are generally thought to have most successfully replaced conifers - in the tropical rainforests. Several things help to explain this condition, among them the ability of conifers to disperse to and across islands subject to frequent, destructive volcanic disturbance; the trees' longevity, allowing them to wait out the intervals between severe disturbance; and the emergent habit, which diminishes direct competition with the angiosperms. I find these explanations unsatisfactory, though, because they do not explain conifer dominance in locales where many thousands of years pass between highly destructive disturbances, or the persistence of conifers that do not show the emergent habit, or the persistence of conifers in forests where many angiosperms grow as emergents.
In their discussion of the Quaternary history of the Araucariaceae, Kershaw and Wagstaff (2001) present a variety of evidence suggesting that a principal control on Araucarian abundance is fire frequency, with widespread declines in Araucarians during periods of high fire frequency associated with aboriginal burning or, earlier, with episodes of dry climate and high lightning ignition frequencies. Conversely, during periods of low fire frequency and generally wet climate, the Araucarians prosper and become widespread forest dominants. Thus I infer that the Australasian success of Araucarians may be governed more by their ability to adapt to their physical environment - precipitation, fire, edaphic factors - than by their ability to compete effectively with angiosperms. This is a pattern we see repeated commonly in conifers throughout the northern hemisphere: they thrive best in settings where there greatest challenges are not biotic (i.e., competition, herbivory or disease), but abiotic (drought, cold, fire, or poor soils).
A concise, current review of the ecology of the genus is provided by Waters et al. (2002), pages 8-10. I recommend reading this short piece now, if you're interested; it is available online HERE.
Limited studies have been done on most of the temperate Australian and New Zealand species. The tropical species have seen little work, and what hase been done, indicates that they do not reliably produce annual rings.
Some species are important timber trees. Most species of Agathis, for example, are among the largest trees known in the areas where they grow, and those species of Araucaria not native to New Caledonia also reach prodigious size. They have been principal species of concern for logging operations in Australia, New Zealand, and many parts of Malesia. Consequently, many of the finest stands of these species have been logged, and many of the species are threatened or endangered (WCMC 2001). Some species, notably Araucaria bidwillii, are also an important food source.
The Araucariaceae include several hardy and attractive species that are very widely used as ornamentals, including Araucaria angustifolia, A. araucana, A. bidwillii and A. heterophylla. These are found in hundreds of botanic gardens and arboreta, and in fact A. heterophylla can be found in even the coldest climates thanks to its popularity as an indoor house plant. Conversely, most of the remaining species of the family are tropical and are not widely known outside of their native ranges. In many cases those ranges are relatively large and the trees fairly easy to locate, but several taxa including Wollemia nobilis, several New Caledonian species of Araucaria, and several Malesian species of Agathis are narrow endemics, endangered by habitat loss.
"From an origin in the Triassic, the family expanded and diversified in both hemispheres in the Jurassic and Early Cretaceous and remained a significant component of Gondwanan vegetation until the latter part of the Cenozoic. The development of angiosperms in the Middle Cretaceous probably assisted in the demise of some araucarian components but there was also evolution of new genera. Recorded diversity in the early Cenozoic of Australia is as high as it was in the Early Cretaceous. Continental separation and associated climatic drying, cooling, and increased variability progressively reduced the ranges of conifers to moist, predominantly mesothermal climates on continents. However, tectonic and volcanic activity, partially associated with Australia's collision with Southeast Asia, provided new opportunities for some araucarian components on Asia-Pacific islands." (Kershaw and Wagstaff 2001).
"The Southern Hemisphere conifer family Araucariaceae has a very restricted present day distribution, but was more widespread in the past. The genus Araucaria is represented by good fossil material in both hemispheres as early as the Jurassic, while Agathis is only known from the Southern Hemisphere beginning in the Cretaceous. Cuticle studies of extant araucarians have enabled accurate comparisons of fossil leaves to living taxa. Araucaria Section Bunya is represented by cones of several types in the Jurassic. In addition to these remains, a suite of araucarian cones showing affinities to several sections of the genus Araucaria have been described from England, Japan and North America" (Stockey 1994).
McKenzie, E.H.C., P.K. Buchanan, and P.R. Johnston. 2002. Checklist of fungi on kauri (Agathis australis) in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 40:269-296. Available: McKenzie et al. 2002, accessed 2009.03.23.
Waters, T., C.A. Galley, R. Palmer, S.T. Turvey, and N.M. Wilkinson. 2002. Report of the Oxford University Expedition to New Caledonia. http://users.ox.ac.uk/~scat1055/expedition/report.htm (20-Nov-2004; 2.5MB Zipfile of a PDF).
An International Araucariaceae Symposium was held in Auckland, New Zealand on 14-17 March 2002. Sixty-six papers were presented; the proceedings are to be published and notice will be presented here when that happens. You can see the list of talks and presenters HERE.
Calder, M.G. 1953. A coniferous petrified forest in Patagonia. Bulletin of British Museum (Natural History) Geology 2: 99-137.
Cantrill, D.J. 1992. Araucarian foliage from the Lower Cretaceous of southern Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Plant Science 153: 622-645.
Cookson, I.C. and S.L. Duigan. 1951. Tertiary Araucariaceae from southeastern Australia, with notes on living species. Australian Journal of Scientific Research Ser. B 4: 415-449.
Enright, N.J.; Ogden, J.; Rigg, L.S. 1999. Dynamics of forests with Araucariaceae in the western Pacific. Journal of Vegetation Science 10(6):793-804.
Florin, R. 1963. The distribution of conifer and taxad genera in time and space. Acta Horti Bergiana 20: 122-312.
Hill, R. S. and A. J. Bigwood. 1987. Tertiary gymnosperms from Tasmania: Araucariaceae. Alcheringa 11: 325-335.
Hill, R.S. and T.J. Brodribb. 1999. Southern conifers in time and space. Australian Journal of Botany 47: 639-696.
Miller, C.N. 1977. Mesozoic conifers. Botanical Review 43: 217-280.
Miller, C.N. 1988. The origin of modern conifer families. P. 448-486 in C.B. Beck (ed.), Origin and evolution of gymnosperms. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
Pole, M.S. 1994. The New Zealand flora - entirely long-distance dispersal? Journal of Biogeography 21: 625-635.
Macphail, M. K. 1997. Comment on M. Pole (1994): "Is New Zealand flora - entirely long distance dispersal?" Journal of Biogeography 24: 113-117.
Raven, P.H. and D.I. Axelrod. 1972. Plate tectonics and Australasian palaeobiography. Science 176: 1379-1386.
Raven, P.H. and D.I. Axelrod. 1974. Angiosperm biogeography and past continental movements. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 61: 539-673.
Stockey, R.A. 1982. The Araucariaceae: an evolutionary perspective. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 37: 133-154.
Stockey, R.A. 1990. Antarctic and Gondwana conifers. P. 179-191 in Antarctic Paleobiology (T.N. Taylor and E.L. Taylor, eds.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Stockey, R.A. 1980b. Jurassic araucarian cone from southern England. Palaeontology 23: 657-666.
Stockey, R.A. 1994. Mesozoic Araucariaceae: morphology and systematic relationships. Journal of Plant Research 107: 493-502.
Stockey, R.A., M. Nishida, and H. Nishida. 1990. Structure and diversity of the woody conifer seedling-like structures from the upper Cretaceous of Hokkaido, Japan. Botanical Gazette 151: 252-262.
Last Modified 2012-11-23