Kauri [Maori] (Boland et al. 1985).
Synonymy: Dammara (Rumph.) Lambert 1822; Salisburyodendron A. V. Bobrov et Melikyan 2006.
At this time (2009), taxonomic relationships within Agathis have been described in a series of publications extending over the past 30 years (Whitmore 1977, Bowen and Whitmore 1980, Page 1980, Whitmore 1980, Whitmore and Page 1980, de Laubenfels 1988, Anonymous 1998, Farjon 2010). These analyses have been based largely on morphology of the pollen cone and leaf cuticle, as foliar morphology is highly variable and female cones, which disintegrate upon drying, are seldom preserved (Whitmore 1980). Work to date has shown a fairly high level of agreement in regard to the total number of taxa (20 species), a situation largely due to the high degree of endemism in the genus, though there has been a long history of lumping or splitting around the most variable and widespread species, A. dammara. The distribution of most taxa is confined to a relatively limited space within the vast archipelago reaching from Sumatra and the Philippines to New Zealand, that comprises the genus' range. Taxonomic investigations by several different authors (de Laubenfels 1988, Page 1980, Whitmore 1980, Anonymous 1998) have attempted to provide an infrageneric classification, but the several schemes presented to date show little agreement, place most species into one of three to five different groups, and fail to include more than two-thirds of the recognized species. However, some molecular work using rbcL gene sequences was done by Setoguchi et al. (1998), evaluating relationships within the Araucariaceae; this at least established that the New Caledonian species (A. corbassonii, A. lanceolata, A. montana, A. moorei and A. ovata) are distinct from the remainder of the genus. We may also note that most authors treat A. borneensis, A. dammara, A. endertii and A. flavescens as very similar. Some recent authors (principally de Laubenfels) also recognize A. celebica and A. philippinensis within this group. These species collectively may be called the "dammara" group, as they have all at one time or another been synonymized with A. dammara, the type species of Agathis. Otherwise, infrageneric structure in Agathis remains to be discovered.
Taxa presented in this treatment include the following:
|A. atropurpurea||Blue kauri||Australia|
|A. australis||Kauri||New Zealand|
|A. borneensis||Dammar minyak||Sumatra, Borneo and the Malay peninsula|
|A. corbassonii||Corbasson kauri||New Caledonia|
|A. dammara||Borneo kauri||Philippines, Indonesia|
|A. endertii||Endert kauri||Borneo|
|A. flavescens||Malesian kauri||Malaysia|
|A. kinabaluensis||Kinabalu kauri||Malaysia|
|A. labillardieri||Western New Guinea kauri||Indonesia and Papua New Guinea|
|A. lanceolata||Koghis kauri||New Caledonia|
|A. macrophylla||Melanesian kauri||Solomon Islands, New Hebrides, Fiji|
|A. microstachya||Atherton kauri||Australia|
|A. montana||Panie kauri||New Caledonia|
|A. moorei||Moore kauri||New Caledonia|
|A. orbicula||Sarawak kauri||Borneo|
|A. ovata||Scrub kauri||New Caledonia|
|A. robusta||Kauri pine||Australia|
|A. silbae||Santo kauri||Vanuatu|
|A. spathulata||Eastern New Guinea kauri||Papua New Guinea|
I suggest that you check out the website Systematics of Agathis, a work-in-progress by Tim Waters, who is currently pursuing a dissertation on this topic at Oxford, under the supervision of Stephen A. Harris and Aljos Farjon. I expect to be checking that site from time to time, and to update this page as appropriate.
Evergreen trees, usually monoecious, very large, with clear straight boles beneath a globular crown (young trees conical). Bark smooth and light grey to reddish, peeling with large thin irregular flakes that thicken on larger trees, leaving a pitted somewhat rough reddish brown surface, emits a milky sap when punctured. Branches horizontal or (when large) turning irregularly upward, leaving circular scars on the trunk after they fall. Buds usually globular, with few, imbricate, overlapping scales. Cotyledons 2, broad, lanceolate with an acute apex. Juvenile leaves larger than adult leaves, more or less acute, varying among the apecies from ovate to lanceolate. Adult leaves opposite, decussate, oval to linear, flat, broad, leathery, thick, with multiple parallel veins, sometimes glaucous beneath, with a short broad petiole, spirally arranged on main branchlets, opposite or alternate on side branchlets, reddish when young, turning dark green, leaving a rough cushion-like scar after they fall. Pollen cones appearing mostly on larger trees after seed cones have appeared, axillary (sometimes terminal), cylindrical, subtended at the base by rounded, sterile bud scales. Seed cones usually on short lateral branchlets, maturing and deciduous in 2 years, globose-ovoid, with numerous, flattened, broadly ovate scales without bracts and with minute apical umbos. Seeds more or less flattened and ovoid, one per scale, with 2 sometimes unevenly developed wings. Seed cone scales and seeds are asymmetrical with both dextral and sinistral forms produced (Silba 1986, de Laubenfels 1988). The wood is straight-grained, pale straw to yellow-brown, with a specific gravity of about 0.47 to 0.61 (Whitmore 1977).
Identification of the species of Agathis is most easily performed using a map: most species are not found in cultivation and have disjunct ranges. In confirmation of species identity, the most important characters are those associated with the pollen cone. Keys are provided by Whitmore (1980) and Farjon (2010). Farjon's key is more applicable to the species discussed here but cannot be reprinted here for copyright reasons. The following key is based on that of Whitmore (1980), modified using information from published descriptions; however it does not yet address the species A. endertii (keys out as A. borneensis), A. lenticula and A. orbicula (mountains of N Borneo), A. silbae (Vanuatu, Isla Espiritu Santo), or A. spathulata (keys out as A. robusta; eastern New Guinea).
|1a||Head of microsporophyll with a distinct umbo, tessellately arranged in the cone||2|
|1b||Head of microsporophyll not umbonate, imbricate in the cone.||3|
|2a||Pollen cone at anthesis 6×11 - 8×16 mm; basal bracts clasping the cone; microsporophylls with stalk not winged, anthers inserted near head. Australia.||A. microstachya|
|2b||Pollen cone at anthesis larger, 10×18-22 mm; basal bracts forming a loose shallow dish, full width of cone or projecting slightly; microsporophylls with broad papery wings extending 1-1.5 mm from head along stalk, anthers attached near the axial end of these wings. New Guinea.||A. labillardieri|
|3a||Microsporophyll head lanceolate, margin crenate-serrate. New Caledonia.||A. moorei|
|3b||Microsporophyll head roundish, margin entire or minutely erose.||4|
|4a||Microsporophyll head narrowing gradually into stalk. Pollen cone a flexuous cylinder 9×60 mm at anthesis. Queensland, east New Guinea, New Britain.||A. robusta|
|4b||Microsporophyll more or less abruptly joined to stalk.||5|
|5a||Microsporophyll head normal to stalk, in adaxial view 1mm thick and 4 mm broad, in tangential view 4×4-5 mm, pale, chartaceous, margin serrulate. New Caledonia.||A. ovata|
|5b||Microsporophyll head in adaxial view round or spatulate, only 1-3 mm broad (4-5 mm in A. borneensis).||6|
|6a||Microsporophyll head large, 4-5 mm across at anthesis. Pollen cone with distinctly convex sides, 14-18 mm diameter at anthesis and ultimately attaining 20 mm. Sumatra, Malaya, Borneo.||A. borneensis|
|6b||Microsporophyll head small, 1-3 mm across at anthesis.||7|
|7a||Leaves small, ovate-lanceolate to lanceolate, 15×10 - 60×15 mm. Pollen cone with 2 of the basal bracts leaf-like. Microsporophyll head thick and small, 2×1.5 mm. Lowland forests. New Zealand.||A. australis|
|7b||Leaves larger except in some mountain trees, relatively broader. Pollen cones without leaf-like bracts (except A. flavescens). Microsporophyll head laminate, at least towards margin.||8|
|8a||Microsporophyll head tiny, 0.6 mm diameter at anthesis, entire. Pollen cone 4×7-9×16 mm. Australia.||A. atropurpurea|
|8b||Microsporophyll head 1.5-2 mm diameter at anthesis. Pollen cone 6×12-10×60 mm.||9|
|9a||Pollen cone 6×25-10×50 mm.||10|
|9b||Pollen cone 6×13-10×25 mm.||13|
|10a||Pollen cone with 2 of the basal bracts enlarged and leaf-like.||11|
|11a||Pollen cone basal bracts to 10x30 mm, seed cone scales with a boss on the upper margin. Peninsular Malaysia.||A. kinabaluensis.|
|11b||Pollen cone basal bracts to 4x20 mm; seed cone scales lacking a boss on the upper margin. Mountains of Borneo.||A. kinabaluensis.|
|10b||Pollen cone without leaf-like bracteoles; peduncle short. New Caledonia.||12|
|12a||Microsporophyll head at anthesis 2 mm across, lightly dentate. Pollen cone 8×40-10×60 mm. Mt. Panie, New Caledonia.||A. montana|
|12b||Microsporophyll head at anthesis 1.5 mm across, serrulate to crenulate. Pollen cone 6×25-10×50 mm. New Caledonia.||A. corbassonii|
|13a||Basal bracts of male cone forming a firm cupule narrower than cone base. New Caledonia.||A. lanceolata|
|13b||Basal bracts forming a loose cupule, at least as wide as cone base except sometimes in A. dammara.||14|
|14a||Microsporophyll head at anthesis 2(-2.5) mm wide ×2 mm long, with a thin margin; anthers 6-14. Pollen cone 8×20-10×25mm at anthesis; cupule wider than cone base. Melanesia.||A. macrophylla|
|14b||Microsporophyll head roundish, to 2 mm across, at anthesis, without a distinct thin margin; anthers 3-6. Pollen cone 6×12-8×20 mm at anthesis, ultimately 10 mm wide; cupule variable. Philippines, Celebes, Moluccas, some Bornean mountains, widely cult. in Java.||A. dammara|
Peninsular Malaysia to New Zealand, including Malesia, the Philippines, New Guinea, Melanesia and Australia. Their range extends from 10°30' N to 38° S, and from 96° E to 180° E. They occur from near sea level to about 2500 m elevation, and in lowland situations they are found on diverse substrates including podzolized sands, ultramafics, carbonates and silicates. They often occur as discrete emergent trees, but sometimes form pure stands or are mixed in the lower canopy (Whitmore 1977).
Agathis is predominately a genus of the tropical rainforests; most species thrive in sites that never see frost, and that receive between five and ten meters of rain per year. In these sites it grows often as solitary trees but more commonly in groves mixed with other rainforest trees. When young the trees have a robust growth and a pyramidal crown in the classic Araucarian growth model, but soon they become emergents, often extending ten or twenty meters into the sunshine above the tropical rainforest canopy, and here the monopodial trunk ends and the tree develops a swelling and complex crown reminiscent more of an oak than of a proper conifer. Few people would call Agathis a conifer on first acquaintance, because it grows in a forest that typically contains no conifers, because of its flat and often broad, leathery leaves, and because its few cones disintegrate on the tree and are rarely seen upon the ground.
Agathis primarily grows as a minor component of relatively inaccessible tropical forests, and most of the species resemble each other very closely. For these reasons it was one of the last groups of conifers to receive a reasonably complete inventory, with only two species described by 1830, another 10 between 1883 and 1916, and the last eight between 1940 and 1988. Fully 80% of the genus has only been described in the years since 1900, so that Agathis could be described as the last major group of conifers to be discovered by modern botany. It would be more fair, though, to say that two species, A. australis and A. dammara, stood for the whole genus during most of the time between discovery and 1900.
Among these two, A. australis, native to northern New Zealand and the most temperate species of the genus in its climate preferences, was discovered even before the island was settled and quickly became the focus of a substantial logging industry; by the time the species was described in 1829, it had been exploited for naval stores (masts and spars) for nearly 50 years (Adams 1986). Exploitation of Agathis resins also began early in New Zealand.
A. dammara, on the other hand, stands for the first Agathis to attract European attention. An Agathis, probably either A. dammara or A. borneensis, was early noticed and exploited by representatives of the Dutch East India Company, and was described to science in 1741 by Rumphius as Dammara alba. This was before Linnaeus’ 1753 publication of the Genera Plantarum, and the genus name Dammara was subsequently found invalid, the earliest valid name, Agathis, being published in 1807. Nonetheless, the great tree named by Rumphius turned out to be the predominate tropical species of Agathis, and was soon being exploited for its timber and its resins throughout most of its range. Though many other names were applied to A. dammara in subsequent years, no one really made any progress in systematically differentiating the species of Agathis until Warburg in 1900, and later, de Laubenfels in the 1970s and 1980s. These two botanists described most of the species now recognized, established that the principal taxonomic characters in the genus concern those of the pollen cone, and showed that most of the species have geographically separate distributions.
Many species of Agathis are listed by the WCMC as vulnerable or endangered and in decline. The WCMC list notes that "Agathis species are distinctive, highly sought and exploited for their valuable timber."
In contrast to most other good-sized conifer genera, most species of Agathis form large trees; many species are the largest trees found in their respective forest ecosystems. The largest, and one of the largest of all conifers, is Agathis australis.
See Agathis australis.
See Agathis australis.
Thoughout its range, Agathis is highly sought after as a source of attractive, straight-grained, easily worked timber (Whitmore 1977). Due to its relative scarcity and premium value, it has now been largely logged out and current production is almost wholly derived from plantations.
The inner bark exudes a translucent or white resin, soluble in alcohol, called Manila Copal. This resin was formerly required for the production of many varnishes and of linoleum, and was harvested at the rate of 15-20,000 tonne per year from the 1920s to 1940s; however, the market has now been almost wholly replaced by synthetic substitutes (Whitmore 1977). Its memory lives on in the Kauri-Butanol rating system, which is a standardized measure of the solvent power of organic solvents based on their interaction with a solution of copal in butanol.
See the various species accounts.
Agathis is Greek for a ball of thread, an allusion to the globose female cone. Kauri is a Maori word, applied by that people to Agathis australis and generalized in modern usage to all species of Agathis (Boland et al. 1985).
Based on data from several wide-ranging species, Agathis participates in vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae; one associate is the phycomycete Endogone (Whitmore 1977).
Known pests include the seed-eating moth Agathiphaga, found in Queensland and the New Hebrides. In Queensland it is attacked by the kauri coccid, coniferococcus agathidis, a defoliator which can weaken the tree, leaving it open to attack by boring beetles such as Euthyrrhinus meditabundus. The kauri thrip Oxythrips agathidis is another, somewhat less destructive defoliator also known from Queensland. Naturally, various species are also attacked by a wide range of fungal diseases (Whitmore 1977).
Adams, J. G. Erne. 1986. Kauri: a king among kings. 2nd rev. ed. Auckland: Wilson & Horton Ltd. ISBN 0-86864-080-8.
Bobrov, A. V. and Melikyan. 2006. Komarovia 4:62.
Page, C.N. 1980. Leaf micromorphology in Agathis and its taxonomic implications. Plant Systematics and Evolution 135: 71-79.
Salisbury, Richard Anthony. 1807. Characters of several Genera in the Natural Order of Coniferae. Transactions of the Linnean Society. 8:308-317. Available: www.botanicus.org, accessed 2009.11.14.
Whitmore, T.C. and C.N. Page. 1980. Evolutionary implications of the distribution and ecology of the tropical genus Agathis. New Phytologist 84: 407-416.
Mabberly, D.J. 2004. The Coming of the Kauris. Curtis's Botanical Magazine 19(4): 252-264. Abstract: Discusses the introduction to Europe of kauris, grown there as greenhouse ornamentals. Explains the importance of Sir Joseph Banks, Kew and the RBG Sydney, and the historical significance of kauris still growing in Sydney.
Stockey, R.A. and I. Atkinson. 1993. Cuticle micromorphology of Agathis Salisbury. International Journal of Plant Science 154: 187-225.
Last Modified 15/17/01 09:47